Re: [patch] scheduler cache affinity improvement in 2.4 kernels by Ingo

Shailabh Nagar (nagar@us.ibm.com)
Mon, 19 Nov 2001 12:06:52 -0500


Hi Partha,

Sorry to see the "shoot-the-messenger" replies to your posting. I've yet to
understand why lmbench is relevant
in an SMP setting.....

Shailabh Nagar
Enterprise Linux Group, IBM TJ Watson Research Center
(914) 945 2851, T/L 862 2851

Partha Narayanan/Austin/IBM@IBMUS@vger.kernel.org on 11/17/2001 11:58:05 AM

Sent by: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org

To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
cc:
Subject: [patch] scheduler cache affinity improvement in 2.4 kernels by
Ingo Molnar

Folks,

The above patch for scheduler cache affinity improvement in 2.4 kernels by
Ingo Molnar was applied to 2.4.14 kernel;
a run of Volano LoopBack BenchMark on a Netfinity 8500 R 1MB 700 MHz PIII
1MB-L2 cache and 1GB memory support produced
the following results:

The UniProcessor throughput was reduced by 40%.
The 4-way throughput showed a very slight degradation of 1%.
The 8-way throughput showed an improvemnet of 10%.

I do not subscribe to lkml and hence please address any future
correspondence on this topic to partha@us.ibm.,com.

Thanks,
Partha

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/