At 20:14 23/11/01, Andrew Morton wrote:
>Daniel Phillips wrote:
> >
> > If there is a performance hit, it's not enough to worry about.
>
>except egcs-1.1.2 (2.91.6) compiles stuff at almost twice the speed
>of gcc3. The person who breaks egcs-1.1.2 for kernel builds owes
>me a quad Xeon, thanks very much.
Have you read the current Documentation/Changes? It says "the 2.5 tree is
likely to drop egcs-1.1.2 workarounds". Whoever wrote that seems to be
wanting to break it in the near future...
Anton
-- "I've not lost my mind. It's backed up on tape somewhere." - Unknown-- Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @) Linux NTFS Maintainer / WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ ICQ: 8561279 / WWW: http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/