Re: 2.4.15-pre9 breakage (inode.c)

[Andrea Arcangeli]

On Sat, Nov 24, 2001 at 07:50:45AM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 24, 2001 at 01:37:22AM -0500, Alexander Viro wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On Sat, 24 Nov 2001, Alexander Viro wrote:
> > 
> > > On Sat, 24 Nov 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > > 
> > > > you are screwed because you were running a broken filesystem: it is its
> > > > own business to drop the inodes if it fails, all it needs to do is to
> > > > call invalidate_inodes(s) internally before returning from the read_super
> > > > in the failure case.
> > > 
> > > Cute.  Do you realize that _every_ fs would have to do that?
> > 
> > Put it that way:
> > 	* if ->read_super() decides to fail, it should evict all inodes
> > it had put into icache.
> > 	* if ->put_super() does any iput(), it should take care to evict
> > that inode from icache.
> 
> exactly.
> 
> > IOW,
> > 	* if we do iput() while we are outside of (success of ->read_super(),
> > call of ->put_super()) - we want that inode to be evicted ASAP.
> > 
> > Which is precisely what 2.4.15+patch does.
> 
> and it's slower and overlay complex compared to the right fix:
> 
> --- 2.4.15aa1/fs/ext2/super.c.~1~	Fri Nov 23 08:21:00 2001
> +++ 2.4.15aa1/fs/ext2/super.c	Sat Nov 24 07:50:19 2001
> @@ -643,6 +643,7 @@
>  			printk(KERN_ERR "EXT2-fs: corrupt root inode, run e2fsck\n");
>  		} else
>  			printk(KERN_ERR "EXT2-fs: get root inode failed\n");
> +		invalidate_inodes(sb);
>  		goto failed_mount2;
>  	}
>  	ext2_setup_super (sb, es, sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY);

this one looks even better (and it doesn't need to propagate the fix to
the lowlevel):

--- 2.4.15aa1/fs/super.c.~1~	Fri Nov 23 08:21:01 2001
+++ 2.4.15aa1/fs/super.c	Sat Nov 24 07:58:37 2001
@@ -470,6 +470,7 @@
 	return s;
 
 out_fail:
+	invalidate_inodes(s);
 	s->s_dev = 0;
 	s->s_bdev = 0;
 	s->s_type = NULL;

Andrea