Re: kdb v1.9 patch fails in main.c 1 of 3 hunks no applied

victor1 torres (camel_3@hotmail.com)
Wed, 28 Nov 2001 00:33:05 +0000

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Torrey Hoffman: "RE: Unresponiveness of 2.4.16"
Previous message: Peter Bornemann: "Re: 'spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7'"
Maybe in reply to: Jeff V. Merkey: "kdb v1.9 patch fails in main.c 1 of 3 hunks no applied"

The reason for that is because patch-2.5.1-pre1 is just basicly the inode
fix and some other things well and the version number change from 2.5.0 to
2.5.1-pre1.
The 2.5.0 is just the same as 2.4.15 except for the version numbers. And one
more thing 2.5.1-pre2 mite have already fixed something in main.c that it
can not go back and change for the kdb patch.

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Torrey Hoffman: "RE: Unresponiveness of 2.4.16"
Previous message: Peter Bornemann: "Re: 'spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7'"
Maybe in reply to: Jeff V. Merkey: "kdb v1.9 patch fails in main.c 1 of 3 hunks no applied"