> >The spec for CML2 is out there, and there's even a CML2-in-C project.
>
> How advanced? Where is the spec, please?
I'm not sure how far the C version is, the spec is:
http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/cml2/cml2-reference.html
> >> The kernel should depend just on the compiler and assembler, IMHO.
> >The right tools for the right job. C is good for the kernel. Python is
> >good at manipulating strings.
>
> Well, IMHO Python is good only in being big and doing things
> slow, but... why the parser cannot be built over flex/bison?. That
> way it can be 'pregenerated' and people won't need additional tools
> to build the kernel.
ESR didn't feel it was the right choice, basically.
-- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/