Re: [kbuild-devel] Converting the 2.5 kernel to kbuild 2.5

David Weinehall (tao@acc.umu.se)
Tue, 4 Dec 2001 21:03:34 +0100


On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 08:53:11PM +0100, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, David Weinehall wrote:
>
> > "So anyone happy with an older distro that didn't ship gcc-2.95.x, x > 2
> > gets screwed when they want to build a newer kernel. Nice."
>
> The difference being that recommended compiler versions don't
> change midway through a stable series. Neither should any other
> part of the buildtools.

AFAIK, changes to the required versions of userland-tools wouldn't
during a stable release happen ever-so-often. I can agree that it
wouldn't be ideal to introduce a completely new requirement, though.

A C-version of CML2-configurator would be a nice solution here.

But, I'm fairly confident that Marcello will make the right decisions
on his own.

/David
_ _
// David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se> /> Northern lights wander \\
// Maintainer of the v2.0 kernel // Dance across the winter sky //
\> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ </ Full colour fire </
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/