I resemble that remark :-)
> > Did you even consider that this is virtually identical to the problem
> > that a network of workstations or servers has? Did it occur
> > to you that
> > people have solved this problem in many different ways? Or
> > did you just
> > want to piss into the wind and enjoy the spray?
>
> I may be a total tool here, but this question is really bugging me :
>
> What, if any, advantages does your proposal have over (say) a Beowulf
> cluster? Why does having the cluster in one box seem a better solution
> than having a Beowulf type cluster with a shared Network filesystem?
Because I can mmap the same data across cluster nodes and get at it using
hardware, so a cache miss is a cache miss regardless of which node I'm
on, and it takes ~200 nanoseconds. With a network based cluster, those
times go up about a factor of 10,000 or so.
----- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/