Re: Would the father of init_mem_lth please stand up

[Pete Zaitcev]

> > No doubt, the existing code was bad. I fixed it somewhat for 2.4,
> > and am feeding it to Marcelo. I can forward-port that to 2.5
> > if anyone is interested.
> 
> Did you clean it up as far as making the disks an array of pointers not
> of objects ?
> 
> Alan

I was going to do it, but have not done yet.

BTW, it was pointed out that my analyzis of the init_mem_lth
was completely wrong - there is no bug that I thought is there.
So I better be careful with 2.4 changes.

-- Pete