Here's the results of testing my Thinkpad T20 with P3-650:
Version  1.93          write   read putcNT getcNT   putc   getc  putcU  getcU
lyta                     142    651   8189   9348   1763   1813  22174  44887
lyta,142,651,8189,9348,1763,1813,22174,44887
Here's the results of testing my Athlon 800 play machine:
Version  1.93          write   read putcNT getcNT   putc   getc  putcU  getcU
test                     146    607   7356   7280   1834   1971  41995  59100
test,146,607,7356,7280,1834,1971,41995,59100
Both machines run ReiserFS.  A quick test indicates that using Ext2 instead 
of ReiserFS triples the  performance of write(fd, buf, 1), but this is 
something I already knew (and had mentioned before on the ReiserFS list).
Also based on previous tests I expect Solaris to outperform Linux with glibc 
on putcNT, getcNT, putc, and getc.  The regular performance of putc() on 
Solaris comes close to putc_unlocked() on Linux with glibc.
I'd like to thank Andrew Morton for forwarding messages from L-K that 
provoked me to write this new test program.
I was tempted to subscribe to L-K to join this discussion, but it seems that 
Linus is saying everything that needs to be said anyway so there's no point. 
;)
-- http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/projects.html Projects I am working on http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/