Re: kiB

[Martin Jonsson]

[e-mail] wrote:

> this shouldn't be that controversial, as it's only visible to people
> compiling kernels :)
>
> --
>
> //anders/g
>
> diff -ru linux-2.5.2-pre2/arch/i386/boot/tools/build.c
> linux-2.5.2-pre2-lvmfix/arch/i386/boot/tools/build.c
> --- linux-2.5.2-pre2/arch/i386/boot/tools/build.c       Mon Jul  2
> 22:56:40 2001
> +++ linux-2.5.2-pre2-lvmfix/arch/i386/boot/tools/build.c        Thu Dec
> 27
> 16:48:55 2001
> @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@
>         if (fstat (fd, &sb))
>                die("Unable to stat `%s': %m", argv[3]);
>         sz = sb.st_size;
> -       fprintf (stderr, "System is %d kB\n", sz/1024);
> +       fprintf (stderr, "System is %d kiB\n", sz/1024);

Shouldn't that be "KiB" when talking about kibibytes?

>         sys_size = (sz + 15) / 16;
>         /* 0x28000*16 = 2.5 MB, conservative estimate for the current
> maximum */
>         if (sys_size > (is_big_kernel ? 0x28000 : DEF_SYSSIZE))

--
/marty