Re: [PATCH] Balanced Multi Queue Scheduler ...

[Davide Libenzi]

On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, J Sloan wrote:

> Timothy Covell wrote:
>
> >Ummm, on my Dual P-III (650MHz with 524988416 Bytes), my current Seti
> >efficiency is 5.35 CpF.   That's a tad high/slower than an Ultra Sparc IIi
> >according to their stats.  So, it would appear that being SMP is hurting my
> >performance a bit.   Unless that is that you meant to run a seti instance for
> >each CPU?   And this reminds me of how "make -j3 bzlilo" is slower than
> >"make -j2 bzlilo".
> >
> Eh?
>
> On my 4-way ppro, make -j4 is much faster
> than a simple "make" for kernel compilation.
> Almost linearly so -

He's saying -j3 on a dual CPU

- Davide