Re: [PATCH][RFC] global errno considered harmful

[ertzog]

And can anybody explain, why is it so ?
(I mean checking for -1, and the switch(errno){}.)
AFAIK, syscall returns us a number (on i386 it is in eax)
and we can use it. Is errno a kernel thing, or GLIBC ?
Haven't we a return code in eax, after   int 0x80 ?  
(sorry, but I never worked on Linux on other architectures)  

 
Best regards.

On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> Is there any particular reason we need a global errno in the kernel
> at all? (which, by the way, doesn't seem to be subject to any kind of