Re: [PATCH] Balanced Multi Queue Scheduler ...

[Stephan von Krawczynski]

> On Saturday 29 December 2001 17:38, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:  
> [Offtopic seti hints :-) ]                                          
> Ummm, on my Dual P-III (650MHz with 524988416 Bytes), my current    
Seti                                                                  
> efficiency is 5.35 CpF.   That's a tad high/slower than an Ultra    
Sparc IIi                                                             
> according to their stats.  So, it would appear that being SMP is    
hurting my                                                            
> performance a bit.   Unless that is that you meant to run a seti    
instance for                                                          
> each CPU?                                                           
                                                                      
Yes, exactly, use one seti per cpu and you will be happy :-)          
As far as I know they intended it this way.                           
                                                                      
Regards,                                                              
Stephan