Re: [PATCH] DevFS support for /dev/cpu/X/(cpuid|msr)

H. Peter Anvin (
Sun, 06 Jan 2002 13:12:45 -0800

Richard Gooch wrote:

>>If you don't understand why this is idiotic, then let me enlighten you:
>>there is no sensible reason why /dev/cpu/%d should only be populated
>>after having run a CPU-dependent device driver. /dev/cpu/%d should be
>>always populated; heck, that's the only way you can sensibly handle
>>hotswapping CPUs.
> I've already privately told Matt that it would be nice if creation of
> /dev/cpu/%d was handled by generic boot code, and not a driver.
> However, I don't see that as essential for the CPUID and MSR drivers.

I don't see putting a lot of devfs shit into the CPUID and MSR drivers
as essential in any shape, way or form. Do it right or don't do it at all.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at