Re: [s-h] Re: ALSA patch for 2.5.2pre9 kernel

[Jauder Ho]

Well, that's kinda silly to have two different approaches. If the
consensus is to keep net/ and drivers/net/, why not just have sound/ and
drivers/sound/ too?

It is not a big stretch to grab sound/ and drivers/sound/ over just
sound/ and certainly the proposal of having a subsys/ directory is
essentially a rename of drivers/ to subsys/.

so....

net/
sound/
drivers/net/
drivers/sound/

The drivers subdir structure closely follows what happens one level up.
Not a problem and maintains the status quo. QED.

--Jauder

On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Linus Torvalds wrote:

>
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Abramo Bagnara wrote:
> >
> > Just to resume, you think that the way to go is:
> >
> > 1) to have sound/ with *all* sound related stuff inside
> > 2) to leave drivers/net/ and net/ like they are now (because although
> > it's suboptimal, to change it is a mess we don't want to face now)
>
> This is my current feeling.
>
> However, la donna é mobile, and I'm a primus donna, fer shure. So don't
> take it _too_ seriously, continue to argue the merits of other approaches.
>
> 		Linus
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [e-mail]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>