Re: [Ext2-devel] [PATCH 7/7 v2] Re: PATCH 2.5.2.9: ext2 unbork fs.h

Jeff Garzik (jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com)
Mon, 07 Jan 2002 18:52:16 -0500


Andreas Dilger wrote:
>
> On Jan 07, 2002 18:28 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > --- linux-fs6/fs/ext2/ext2_fs_i.h Mon Sep 17 20:16:30 2001
> > +++ linux-fs7/fs/ext2/ext2_fs_i.h Mon Jan 7 05:08:38 2002
> > @@ -36,6 +36,10 @@
> > __u32 i_prealloc_count;
> > __u32 i_dir_start_lookup;
> > int i_new_inode:1; /* Is a freshly allocated inode */
> > +
> > +#ifdef __KERNEL__
> > + struct inode i_inode_data;
> > +#endif
> > };
>
> Since ext2_fs_i.h only describes the in-memory data for ext2 inodes, there
> is no reason to #ifdef __KERNEL__ any changes therein. I have seen several
> other people worry about changes to this file in the past also, and I was
> going to suggest adding a comment to the file, but I see it already says
> "inode data in memory" so I don't know what else to add...

If that is ok with everyone else, it's ok with me. I just noticed that
ext2_fs_sb.h already uses kernel-specific types, adding weight to the
argument.

Jeff

-- 
Jeff Garzik      | Alternate titles for LOTR:
Building 1024    | Fast Times at Uruk-Hai
MandrakeSoft     | The Took, the Elf, His Daughter and Her Lover
                 | Samwise Gamgee: International Hobbit of Mystery
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/