Re: PATCH 2.5.2.9: ext2 unbork fs.h (part 1/7)

[Daniel Phillips]

On January 7, 2002 10:27 pm, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > On January 7, 2002 03:13 pm, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> > > Of course fs which are not adapted would still just work with the fs_i()
> > > and fs_sb() macros and/or using two separate pointers.
> > 
> > Yes, the fs_* macros are the really critical part of all this.  I'd like to
> > get them in early, while we hash out the rest of it.  I think Jeff supports
> > me in this, possibly Al as well.
> 
> agreed, from my side

OK, are we agreed that:

  - We're waiting for Al to merge ext/*alloc.c changes

  - When that's done we will apply what would be my unbork patches (2: ext2_i) and
    (3: ext2_sb) to both 2.4.current and 2.5.current?  Subject to getting these two
    patches into the form everybody likes, of course.

  - We have some time in the interim to figure out how best to unbork fs.h, but we
    all agree it needs to be done soon.

--
Daniel