This actually solved the problem, and even gave me a little increase in
read speed as a bonus.
Is this somehow planned for a 2.4 merge?
roy
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
>
> > > you really should try akpm's "[patch, CFT] improved disk read latency"
> > > patch. it sounds almost perfect for your application.
>
> > It seemed like it helped first, but after a while, some 99 processes
> > went Defunct, and locked. After this, the total 'bi' as reported from
> > vmstat went down to ~ 900kB per sec
> >
> > What should I do?
>
> I've done a little bit of low memory testing with my -rmap
> VM patch, the system seems to be working just fine with 8MB
> of RAM ...
>
> If you have the time, could you try the following patch ?
>
> http://surriel.com/patches/2.4/2.4.17-rmap-11a
>
>
> regards,
>
> Rik
> --
> "Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS"
> -- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document
>
> http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
>
-- Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, MCSE, MCNE, CLS, LCAComputers are like air conditioners. They stop working when you open Windows.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/