Re: initramfs programs (was [RFC] klibc requirements)

Dave Jones (davej@suse.de)
Thu, 10 Jan 2002 12:21:41 +0100 (CET)


On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Alan Cox wrote:

> > We have also been over the fact that dmidecode, if written
> > appropriately, could be setuid, or call a "dmicat" setuid program.
> > This is a dmidecode implementation detail.
> We've also proved the DMI data is too unreliable to be used, so the entire
> problem space is irrelevant

That's not a problem, remember Eric volunteered to maintain the
enormous black list 8-)

-- 
| Dave Jones.        http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/