Re: [patch] O(1) scheduler, -H5

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Fri, 11 Jan 2002 15:22:48 +0000 (GMT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Martin Knoblauch: "Re: Fixing the vm or merging rmap into the official tree?"
Previous message: Trond Myklebust: "[NFS] some strangeness (at least) with linux-2.4.17-NFS_ALL patch"
Next in thread: Russell King: "Re: [patch] O(1) scheduler, -H5"
Reply: Russell King: "Re: [patch] O(1) scheduler, -H5"

> Unfortunately it wasn't a simple "replace global irq with spinlocks" - some
> code also got moved around so its not clear that the problem was fixed by
> the spinlocks or the code reordering. I'd rather know which it was.

The code re-ordering fixes the bug. The spinlocks are an unrelated change
that belong in a seperate diff.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Martin Knoblauch: "Re: Fixing the vm or merging rmap into the official tree?"
Previous message: Trond Myklebust: "[NFS] some strangeness (at least) with linux-2.4.17-NFS_ALL patch"
Next in thread: Russell King: "Re: [patch] O(1) scheduler, -H5"
Reply: Russell King: "Re: [patch] O(1) scheduler, -H5"