Re: [PATCH] update: preemptive kernel for O(1) sched

[William Lee Irwin III]

On Sun, 2002-01-13 at 18:22, Dieter N?tzel wrote:
>> what about lock-break?
>> I am running your former one as always with 
>> lock-break-rml-2.4.18-pre1-1.patch ...;-)

On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 06:48:17PM -0500, Robert Love wrote:
> I haven't tested O(1) together with lock-break personally, yet, but I
> have a confirmation of success from a couple of users.  There are no
> reasons it shouldn't work.

I have at least run it on my laptop, together with rmap even.
No pathological behavior that I can tell. Of course, the interactive
response is wonderful, but I haven't precisely measured anything, as
I have enough other things to measure precisely it's a bit far afield.

Cheers,
Bill