Re: Aunt Tillie builds a kernel (was Re: ISA hardware discovery -- the elegant solution)

[Charles Cazabon]

Eric S. Raymond <[e-mail]> wrote:
> Alan Cox <[e-mail]>:
> > Now to do everything you describe does not need her to configure a custom
> > kernel tree. Not one bit. You think apt or up2date build each user a custom
> > kernel tree ?
> 
> Is it OK in your world that Aunt Tillie is dependent on a distro maker?  Is
> it OK that she never gets to have a kernel compiled for anything above the
> least-common-denominator chip?  

Yes, and yes.  Aunt Tillie is running Linux because someone installed a
distribution for her.

She is never going to need anything out of her kernel that her vendor-shipped
update kernels do not provide.  She is never going to need the 1% performance
difference she might she if she custom-compiled a kernel for her architecture
rather than using the closest one shipped by her vendor.

> But the point of this game is for Aunt Tillie to have more and better
> choices.  Isn't that what we're supposed to be about?

No.  We're supposed to be about stuff that works.  Vendor-shipped kernels work
for 99.9% of people.  The remaining 0.1% have no need for an
"auto-configurator".

Charles
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon                         <[e-mail]>
GPL'ed software available at:  http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------