> On January 14, 2002 10:09 am, yodaiken@fsmlabs.com wrote:
>
>>UNIX generally tries to ensure liveness. So you know that
>> cat lkarchive | grep feel | wc
>>will complete and not just that, it will run pretty reasonably because
>>for UNIX _every_ process is important and gets cpu and IO time.
>>When you start trying to add special low latency tasks, you endanger
>>liveness. And preempt is especially corrosive because one of the
>>mechanisms UNIX uses to assure liveness is to make sure that once a
>>process starts it can do a significant chunk of work.
>>
>
> You're claiming that preemption by nature is not Unix-like?
Unix started out life as a _time-sharing_ OS. It never claimed to
be preemptive or real time. For those, you waited a while, then
got to run MACH.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Rick Stevens, SSE, VitalStream, Inc. rstevens@vitalstream.com -
- 949-743-2010 (Voice) http://www.vitalstream.com -
- -
- Change is inevitable, except from a vending machine. -
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/