Re: [BUG] Suspected bug in getpeername and getsockname

[Balbir Singh]

>Can the user eat up more than a scheduling quantum because of the
>work done by ->getname()?  I certainly don't think you can prove
>this.
>

That depends on what ->getname() does. Anyway
in my opinion any code which does all the processing
and then catches any error is BROKEN.

>It certainly isn't work the long discussion we're having about it,
>that is for sure.
>

I agree! no point

>You want this to make your broken getname() protocol semantics work
>and I'd like you to address that instead.  I get the feeling that
>you've designed this weird behavior and that it is not specified in
>any standard anyways that your protocol must behave in this way.  I
>suggest you change it to work without the user length being
>available.
>

There is no other choice but to live with it.

Regards,
Balbir

_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: 
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx