Re: Internal compiler error in 2.4.5 (hacky workaround)

[Arjan van de Ven]

Pavel Machek wrote:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> This makes gcc survive... adding volatile everywhere ;-).
> 
> int blk_ioctl(volatile kdev_t dev, volatile unsigned int cmd, volatile
> unsigned long arg)
> {
>         volatile request_queue_t *q;
>         volatile struct gendisk *g;
>         volatile u64 ullval = 0;
>         volatile int intval, *iptr;
>         volatile unsigned short usval;

For 2.4 I can see such a workaround being accepted; however for 2.5 I
would say 
to keep the code clean of such things and rather get the compiler fixed
(or the
specific version depricated).