Re: bit ops on unsigned long?

David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Sun, 17 Mar 2002 22:43:16 -0800 (PST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Shawn Starr: "Re: 2.4.19-pre3-ac1 - Quotactl patch"
Previous message: Pete Zaitcev: "Re: Linux 2.5: Yamaha YMF744B"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: bit ops on unsigned long?"

From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 01:03:30 -0500

Even if the port doesn't support CONFIG_PREEMPT at all?

Linus and myself plan on using it for something else
(something akin to a softirq+otherstuff count).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Shawn Starr: "Re: 2.4.19-pre3-ac1 - Quotactl patch"
Previous message: Pete Zaitcev: "Re: Linux 2.5: Yamaha YMF744B"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: bit ops on unsigned long?"