Re: bit ops on unsigned long?

[Rusty Russell]

In message <[e-mail]> you write:
> David S. Miller wrote:
> 
> >   From: Rusty Russell <[e-mail]>
> >   Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 14:08:08 +1100
> >
> >   +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
> >    	/* Set the preempt count _outside_ the spinlocks! */
> >    	idle->thread_info->preempt_count = (idle->lock_depth >= 0);
> >   +#endif
> >
> >This part of your patch has to go.  Every port must
> >provide the preempt_count member of thread_info regardless
> >of the CONFIG_PREEMPT setting.

Sorry, slipped in so I could compile on PPC.  Discard that part of the
patch please.

Thanks,
Rusty.
--
  Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.