Re: fadvise syscall?

[Richard Gooch]

Andrew Morton writes:
> Note that it applies to a file descriptor.  If
> posix_fadvise(FADV_DONTNEED) is called against a file descriptor,
> and someone else has an fd open against the same file, that other
> user gets their foot shot off.  That's OK.

Let me verify that I understand what you're saying. Process A and B
independently open the file. The file is already in the cache (because
other processes regularly read this file). Process A is slowly reading
stuff. Process B does FADV_DONTNEED on the whole file. The pages are
dropped.

You're saying this is OK? How about this DoS attack:
	int fd = open ("/lib/libc.so", O_RDONLY, 0);
	while (1) {
		posix_fadvise (fd, 0, 0, FADVISE_DONTNEED);
		sleep (1);
	}

Let me see that disc head move! Wheeee!

				Regards,

					Richard....
Permanent: [e-mail]
Current:   [e-mail]