Re: Putrid Elevator Behavior 2.4.18/19

[Mike Fedyk]

On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 06:16:45PM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> > > The elevator starvation change went into 2.4.19-pre1 I think.
> > > It shouldn't affect the problem which you've described - that
> > > change improved the situation where tasks were sleeping for
> > > long periods when they want to insert new requests.  But the
> > > problem which you're observing appears to affect already-inserted
> > > requests.
> > > 
> > > "Several minutes" is downright odd.  From your description
> > > it seems that all the requests are writes, but some of the
> > > writes (at a remote end of the disk) are being bypassed far
> > > too many times.
> > > 
> > > The bypass count _is_ tunable.  Although it sounds like the logic
> > > has come unstuck in some manner, it would be interesting if
> > > changing the elevator latency parameters for that queue affected
> > > the situation.
> > > 
> > > Have you experimented with `elvtune -r NNN /dev/foo' and
> > > `elvtune -w NNN /dev/foo'?
> > 
> > No, but I will test this tonight.  I am in tonight working on 
> > this problem until I run it down.
> > 
> > Jeff
> > 
> 
> 
> Andrew,
> 
> I have been running a test run against 2.4.19-pre4 (and later) for 
> over a week non-stop and the elevator problem appears to have been 
> corrected by this fix.  I will update further if the problem 
> resurfaces.
>

That's good news.

Are you still working on the A/B list patch?  I'd imagine that it could make
several problems easier to fix in the block layer.

> :-)
>

:)