Re: Request for 2.4.20 to be a non-trivial-bugfixes-only version

On Fri, 29 Mar 2002, Ruth Ivimey-Cook wrote:

> Folks,
> 
> Can we celebrate getting to 2.4.20 with a really super-stable version of 
> the kernel, by only admitting patches that fix known and significant bugs 
> (that is, no new features, no more optimisations, no backports, no "it's 
> only a line" fixes)?
> 
> It would help 2.4 a lot, I think.
> 

I'd prefer that too! We've always cheered these x.y.20 versions for being
so stable (2.2.20 comes to mind). I hope we can keep up the tradition *g*