Re: [PATCH] for_each_zone / for_each_pgdat

Andrea Arcangeli (andrea@suse.de)
Tue, 16 Apr 2002 15:36:19 +0200


On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 01:27:26AM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 02:44:58AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 04:20:58PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> > > I won't scream too loud, but I think it's pretty much done right as is.
> >
> > Regardless if that's the cleaner implementation or not, I don't see much
> > the point of merging those cleanups in 2.4 right now: it won't make any
> > functional difference to users and it's only a self contained code
> > cleanup, while other patches that make a runtime difference aren't
> > merged yet.
>
> Sorry to say it, but if you want patches to be merged, why
> don't you submit them ?

I submitted these in a past email:

ftp://ftp.us.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/patches/v2.4/2.4.19pre5/vm-33/aa-*

Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/