Re: [PATCH] for_each_zone / for_each_pgdat

[Mike Fedyk]

On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 03:44:18PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 06:30:16PM -0700, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> > under testing.  Also, Andrew found a problem with your locking changes when
> > he split up your patch, and at the time you were saying it is ready and
> > there were no bug reports against in...
> 
> btw, it was a problem only for ext3.
>

Right, I forgot to mention that.

> > Does this patch conflict in any way with your vm patches?  If not they
> > should be able to co-exist.
> 
> it will generate rejects, but that's not the problem. My point is that
> your same argument about merging in later kernels, stable kernel tree,
> could be applied to patches that makes no difference to users too.
> 

True.  Has Rik's cleanup already been merged into 2.5?

> Andrea
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [e-mail]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>