Re: 2.5.11 + framebuffer compile patch -- OOPS in blk_get_readahead+a/60

James Simmons (jsimmons@transvirtual.com)
Mon, 29 Apr 2002 15:23:44 -0700 (PDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Alessandro Suardi: "2.5.11 breaks snd_printk if SND_VERBOSE_PRINTK = n"
Previous message: J.A. Magallon: "Re: Accurately measure CPU cycles used by a program? thanks"
In reply to: Miles Lane: "2.5.11 + framebuffer compile patch -- OOPS in blk_get_readahead+a/60"
Next in thread: Miles Lane: "Re: 2.5.11 + framebuffer compile patch -- OOPS in blk_get_readahead+a/60"

> >>EIP; c01ee59a <blk_get_readahead+a/60> <=====
> Trace; c023a87c <device_size_calculation+ac/230>
> Trace; c023ab1f <do_md_run+11f/3d0>
> Trace; c02286eb <fbcon_cursor+9b/200>

That is strange. Which framebuffer driver are you using?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alessandro Suardi: "2.5.11 breaks snd_printk if SND_VERBOSE_PRINTK = n"
Previous message: J.A. Magallon: "Re: Accurately measure CPU cycles used by a program? thanks"
In reply to: Miles Lane: "2.5.11 + framebuffer compile patch -- OOPS in blk_get_readahead+a/60"
Next in thread: Miles Lane: "Re: 2.5.11 + framebuffer compile patch -- OOPS in blk_get_readahead+a/60"