Re: [PATCH] missing checks in exec_permission_light()

In article <[e-mail]>,
you write:
>Hi!
>
>> +	if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) && capable(CAP_DAC_READ_SEARCH))
>> +		return 0;
>
>Is this right? This means that root can do cat /, no? That does not
>seem like expected behaviour.
>									Pavel

exec_permission_lite() is only used for MAY_EXEC checks.

Paul