(no subject)

[Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz]

On Tue, 7 May 2002, Roman Zippel wrote:
> > > Another thing: where is the equivalilent part of this removed code?
> > Look closer it's there in ide-probe.c.
>
> Does it still take the correct byte swapping into account?
> Did you consider using a table for the fixup? It's nothing perfomance
> critical and this might generate more compact code.

table can be used but it is harder to maintain,
if you convert it to table please use __le*_top_cpu() macros

--
bkz