Re: bug in fork failure path?

David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Tue, 07 May 2002 17:06:21 -0700 (PDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel"
Previous message: Keith Owens: "Re: kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel"

From: Colin Gibbs <colin@gibbs.dhs.org>
Date: 18 Apr 2002 20:10:22 -0500

Can we move the init_new_context to just after the mm_init call? Works
nicely on sparc. Most archs have a fairly trivial init_new_context
anyway.

I've put this fix into my trees to make sure it doesn't get
lost. Thanks for spotting it.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel"
Previous message: Keith Owens: "Re: kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel"