Those names are not really "old", but convenient shorthand. And it's
more systems than you think.
> and
> 
>   c) have users not capable of translating that syntax to either
>      the new devfs or traditional Linux syntax?
> 
> I don't think there are more then about ten, and no I _absolutely_
> do not consider that a reason to bloat the kernel, even if it is just
> source and image bloat.
A lot more people are using devfs than you realise. Removing the code
would screw them over. Leave it alone.
				Regards,
					Richard....
Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au
Current:   rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/