[on soft mount timeouts]
> > But shouldn't those timeouts become errors over at the clients?
>
> Yes... but "write" won't see an error. Only 'fsync' or maybe 'close',
> and many applications ignore errors from these operations.
How come? Isn't the client side innately synchronous (as RPC clients in
general)?
Or is this one of thost thing that are now done differently?
/Sverker
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/