Re: KBuild 2.5 Impressions

Skip Ford (skip.ford@verizon.net)
Thu, 30 May 2002 21:20:27 -0400


Daniel Phillips wrote:
> On Friday 31 May 2002 02:13, Kenneth Johansson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2002-05-31 at 01:19, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > >
> > > I think that with these breakups done the thing would be sufficiently
> > > digestible to satisfy Linus. Now that I think of it, Linus's request
> >
> > Maybe I'm the idiot here but what dose this gain you??
> >
> > The reason to break up a patch is not simply to get more of them. There
> > is no point in splitting if you still need to use every single one of
> > them to make anything work.
>
> See above. It's all about analyzing the structure of the patch. To be
> fair though, it took me less than an hour to get a pretty good idea of
> how the current patch set is structured.

I could be wrong but I think Linus wants small patches that slowly
convert kbuild24 to kbuild25, and not just a chopped up wholesale
kbuild25.

There's a big difference between splitting kb25 into pieces and figuring
out a way to migrate from kb24 to kb25 with small patches. You're
suggesting the former while Linus wants the latter.

-- 
Skip
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/