Re: [patch 2/16] list_head debugging

[Bernd Jendrissek]

[sorry for the nonexistent In-Reply-To/whatever headers - cutting&pasting]

Andrew Morton wrote:
>   A common and very subtle bug is to use list_heads which aren't on any
>   lists. It causes kernel memory corruption which is observed long after
>   the offending code has executed.
>
>   The patch nulls out the dangling pointers so we get a nice oops at the
>   site of the buggy code.

I'm not current with the kernel tree, but will one such oops occur in
netfilter?  See

http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/netfilter-announce/2002/000010.html

Hmm, no.  A DoS maybe?

>   --- 2.5.19/include/linux/list.h~list-debug Sat Jun 1 01:18:05 2002
>   +++ 2.5.19-akpm/include/linux/list.h Sat Jun 1 01:18:05 2002
>   @@ -94,6 +94,11 @@ static __inline__ void __list_del(struct
>    static __inline__ void list_del(struct list_head *entry)
>    {
>            __list_del(entry->prev, entry->next);
>   + /*
>   + * This is debug. Remove it when the kernel has no bugs ;)
>   + */
>   + entry->next = 0;
>   + entry->prev = 0;
>    }
>
>    /**

Bernd Jendrissek