> Was that using Snoopy?
I believe that's what it was called. The program was sniffusb 0.13. I had
problems get later versions to work. Then I found a nice treatise on
interpreting the log:
http://www.toth.demon.co.uk/usb/reverse-0.2.txt
> Any objections to me taking this to 2.4 and 2.5?
Feel free. I wonder if MS Intellimouse 3.0 has the same resolution problem.
AFAIK they use the same sensor.
> This could have been handled by a blacklist table quirk. Any reason why
> you chose to do it this way?
How does the blacklist work? Originally I wanted to put the setting in
mousedev but I wasn't sure how to access the usb_device from there.
-- /* Chris Faherty <rallymonkey@bellsouth.net> */ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/