Re: [PATCH] 2.5.21 kill warnings 4/19

Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)
Tue, 11 Jun 2002 09:26:37 +0100

On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 08:33:18AM +0200, Martin Dalecki wrote:
> 6. In esp. ARM seems to be much better off with GCC 3.1 then anything else.

Not yet proven. Only a minority of people are using gcc 3.1 compared
to gcc 2.95.x to build ARM kernels currently.

We've already found a few things that need changing in 2.5 (which haven't
been updated in 2.4 yet) that are needed for gcc 3.1 to build the kernel
properly.

-- 
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)                The developer of ARM Linux
             http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/