This is a wider question: uint64_t and int64_t (et. al) are ISO C
<stdint.h> requirements. Whether we should begin migration in 2.5, or
leave them alone is a Linus question.
> I think it should be uint64_t to allow glibc to copy and mangle the file into
> its header tree.
I don't think that's really an issue, is it?
Rusty.
-- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/