Re: [PATCH] 2.5.21 Nonlinear CPU support

Rusty Russell (rusty@rustcorp.com.au)
Wed, 12 Jun 2002 18:06:47 +1000

In message <5.1.0.14.2.20020612084157.041970e0@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk> you write:
> >Now, you *could* only allocate buffers for cpus where cpu_possible(i)
> >is true, once the rest of the patch goes in. That would be a valid
> >optimization.
>
> Please explain. What is cpu_possible()?

--- working-2.5.19-pre-hotcpu/include/asm-i386/smp.h Tue Jun 4 15:37:09 2002
+++ working-2.5.19-hotcpu/include/asm-i386/smp.h Mon Jun 3 18:00:09 2002
@@ -93,6 +94,8 @@
#define smp_processor_id() (current_thread_info()->cpu)

#define cpu_online(cpu) (cpu_online_map & (1<<(cpu)))
+
+#define cpu_possible(cpu) (phys_cpu_present_map & (1<<(cpu)))

extern inline unsigned int num_online_cpus(void)
{

ie. "Can this CPU number *ever* exist?", for exactly this kind of
optimization. It looks like it was a mistake to leave that to a later
patch, but I didn't appreciate the 64k-per-cpu buffer for NTFS (what
is it for, by the way? per-cpu buffering for a filesystem seems, um,
wierd).

Rusty.

--
  Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/