Re: [PATCH] 2.5.21 IDE 91
Dave Jones (davej@suse.de)
Sat, 15 Jun 2002 13:50:12 +0200
On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 07:41:06AM -0400, rwhron@earthlink.net wrote:
> > When the IDE carnage first started back circa 2.5.3, I had contemplated
> > not merging *any* of the IDE patches, just so that people who want to
> > work on other areas could have something solid to build upon.
> > I regret not following through on that instinct.
>
> I give the -dj series a vote of "good taste". In my testing they have
> been reliable. Recently, 2.5.20-dj[34] completed all my tests, whereas
> 2.5.{19,20,21} haven't. I realize breakage in the development series
> is expected and sometimes good. Nonetheless, "two thumbs up" for -dj.
That's interesting. What exactly was failing ? It'd be in everyones
interests to get those bits pushed to Linus sooner.
Dave.
--
| Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/