Re: CML2

Sam Ravnborg (sam@ravnborg.org)
Sat, 22 Jun 2002 21:54:53 +0200


On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 08:55:10PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:

> Anyway, not all hope is lost, I started my own configuration system some
> time ago, which will be less complex than CML2. It's only advancing a bit
> slowly currently, as I only have little time to work on it.

Hi Roman.
Despite the fact that you are advancing slowly could you explain what your plans
are with the configuration system?

As of today we have basically three different ways to read the Config.in files,
where xconfig are the one with the best but also most critical parser/analyser.
Do you plan to replace all of them or?

Have you planned to let CML1 and ZCONF(or whatever you planned to call the
new semantic) co-exist?

Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/