Re: [RFC] new module format

Roman Zippel (zippel@linux-m68k.org)
Wed, 17 Jul 2002 22:12:08 +0200 (CEST)


Hi,

On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote:

> > 1. Properly fixing module races: I'm playing with a init/start/stop/exit
> > model, this has the advantage that we can stop anyone from reusing a
> > module and we only have to wait for remaining users to go away until we
> > can safely unload the module.
>
> I'm satisfied that, for filesystems at least, all the module races can be
> solved without adding start/stop, and I will present code in due course.

The start/stop methods are not needed to fix the races, they allow better
control of the unload process.

> However, Rusty tells me there are harder cases than filesystems. At this
> point I'm waiting for a specific example.

For filesystems it's only simpler because they only have a single entry
point, but the basic problem is always the same. We have to protect
against module load/unload and unregister. Without an interface change we
will have to add module owner pointers everywhere and we will see
contention on the unload_lock due to try_inc_mod_count.

bye, Roman

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/