Re: Remain Calm: Designated initializer patches for 2.5

[Anton Altaparmakov]

At 07:56 18/07/02, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>>Well, I also like the non C99 variant that is in gcc as well, but if gcc is
>>going to drop that in the future in favour of the C99 standard... But yes,
>>not having the spacing is _ugly_, what I'm doing is:
>>static struct proto_ops SOCKOPS_WRAPPED(atalk_dgram_ops) = {
>>         .family         = PF_APPLETALK,
>>         .release        = atalk_release,
>>         .bind           = atalk_bind,
>>         .connect        = atalk_connect,
>>         .socketpair     = sock_no_socketpair,
>>         .accept         = sock_no_accept,
>
>Agreed, that's the way to do it.

Yes, the patch for ntfs that just found its way into my inbox is _really_ 
ugly... Something like the above would be much nicer.

Anton