Re: [patch 2/9] 2.5.6 lm_sensors

Kelledin (kelledin+LKML@skarpsey.dyndns.org)
Fri, 19 Jul 2002 23:08:54 -0500


> Anything short of "Destroy my precious Thinkpad? [y/N]"
> probably is insufficient. Frankly, I don't think even that's
> enough. Once this is mainlined, someone will want to build a
> kitchen sink distro kernel with sensor support and if the code
> itself isn't autodetecting whether it's on a problematic
> platform, it won't be long before someone boots their Thinkpad
> off a friend's CDR and toasts it.

I agree, the lm_sensors driver should maintain a blacklist for
ThinkPads, and make it possible to disable the blacklist only by
going in and hacking the kernel source manually. Whenever the
lm_sensors drivers detect a blacklisted ThinkPad, they should
vehemently refuse to function.

-- 
Kelledin
"If a server crashes in a server farm and no one pings it, does 
it still cost four figures to fix?"

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/