> vojtech@suse.cz said:
> > Ok. Is the use in drivers/input/serio.c buggy?
>
> If it matters that the thread can miss wakeup events and sleep indefinitely
> while there's a 'SERIO_RESCAN' event pending, then yes it looks buggy.
>
> serio_thread() serio_rescan()
> -------------- --------------
>
> serio_handle_events();
> serio->event |= SERIO_RESCAN;
> wake_up(&serio_wait);
> sleep_on(&serio_wait);
>
> ...sleeps...
>
> If both serio_thread() and serio_rescan() hold the BKL you're OK. It looks
> like serio_rescan() doesn't, though.
Thanks for the explanation. Yes, this could happen.
> > What should be it replaced with?
>
> In general, the response 'anything but sleep_on' is considered appropriate.
> Try wait_event().
-- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/